![]() Perez wrote that one bettor who said he had no prior knowledge of the stunt had already had his account shut down by Bovada. "We will continue to make sure that any publicity stunts or ill-intended behavior cannot adversely affect the outcome of a player's wager."Īccording to Perez, Bovada is refunding those that wagered there would not be a fan on the field during the game and paying out winning bets for accounts that were not linked to early knowledge of Andrade's plan. "Our players have always trusted us to ensure the integrity of all props offered in our sportsbook," a Bovada spokesman told Perez. Perez at Front Office Sports, Bovada was working to identify accounts that knew of Andrade's planned stunt. By making several smaller wagers rather than one big $50,000, it's more conceivable that Andrade could have gotten a healthy wager down on his run.Īccording to a report from A.J. Cryptic, but I’m going to take a leap of faith and figure that’s more snaps for Gibbs in the slot.Hey TMZ this quote right here tells you the story is completely fabricated /1LH2DBxdasīut despite initial suspicions, it appears that there was some truth to Andrade's claim, though he still won't be cashing in on his run.Īndrade told a Tampa radio station that he had gotten friends to place wagers from different accounts on the gambling site Bovada, betting that there would be a fan on the field at +750 odds. I see him on the field for 25+ pass routes (both Swift and Williams were at better than 1.3 yards per route run last season).Īnd then OC Ben Johnson makes the comments about using Gibbs “in ways people don’t quite think we might”. But Swift was not drafted by this regime, and there wasn’t nearly as much capital invested in him (big difference between the 12th pick and a high second rounder). It’s going to be a time share, but Gibbs is Campbell and GM Brad Holmes’ guy - I think there is public worry about the timeshare because of Swift’s utilization last season. Yes, David Montgomery exists, but he profiles to take the Jamaal Williams role (and in my opinion, not 100% of that role). There isn’t a significant change in pass defense personnel that suggests the defensive philosophy will flip. Last season, the Chiefs allowed 13 RBs to eclipse this total in 17 regular season games. Chiefs DC Steve Spagnuolo’s defense have allowed top 5 production (both targets and yards) to RBs in each of the last 4 seasons. Not only do we know the obvious with KC being favorites and the Lions could/should find themselves in plenty of passing situations, but the Chiefs defense has been designed to stop the downfield throws to receivers for years. I have it as a tick higher in 2023, given the current state of their pass catchers.Īnd he gets an A+ matchup against the Chiefs in week 1. ![]() This is a lions offense that supplied RBs with a 20% target share and 15% yard share in 2022. Outside of Amon Ra St Brown, there are a lot of question marks. ![]() They are clearly enamored by Gibbs, and drafted him to be a focal point of the offense.ĭ’Andre Swift is gone, and the receiver core is weak. Here’s what we know: the Lions used the 12th pick on Gibbs (and apparently were going to take him at 6 had they not traded down). Posted/tweeted earlier - just correcting to the right line.įirst play of the season… an over on a rookie… here we go…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |